Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
What does it take for a book to be considered Non-Fiction?
Austin Maher- What
does it take for a book to be considered Non-Fiction?
I think
that if you are going to say a book is non-fiction then that’s what it should
be. If it is just sort of true, put that on the cover like movies do. And say “Based
on a true story”. That way people can’t like almost revolt against your
writing. Also I think you almost need more than one point of view or additional
characters in your story. That way you can have multiple views or see how
things affected them. I also don’t understand why people try and get away with
lying in stories because of all the technologies we have available today. You aren’t
going to get away with it. You can’t like yeah I was arrested 4 times in New
York. Because all someone has to do is look in the criminal justice book of records
for that area or state. And if you don’t show up you are busted.
I think
we do need lines between genres because that way you know if you are reading
about something that really happened or something that was just created out of
pure imagination. Having a good idea is one thing, but I think your writing gets
better recognition if it was true. Because people and the press are like “hey! Let’s
all go look this guy up and interview him and make a movie.” Like the story 127
hours if that was a made up story I don’t think the part when he cut his
own arm off would have been as intense as it was because he actually had to do
that in his journey.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)